This article is 2 years old
Lawyer: Dissenting SRC judgment does not taint majority decision
A majority verdict with a dissenting judgment should not be seen as being of a lower decision than a unanimous decision by a three-member or five-member appeal bench, a senior lawyer said today.
Lawyer Haniff Khatri Abdulla, who spoke as a panellist at a Bar Council public forum today, cited the Federal Court's majority 4-1 verdict that denied former prime minister Najib Abdul Razak's application to review his ongoing 12-year jail term in the RM42 million SRC International corruption case...
Verifying user
RM12.50 / month
- Unlimited access to award-winning journalism
- Comment and share your opinions on all our articles
- Gift interesting stories to your friends
- Tax deductable